User Scenarios China GIS
Quest: Locating a certain place in a certain time: Suzhou 苏州 in the year 1045.
Output:
putting the find into its administrative context:
Allow to make one of the shown points the 'main' [red] point by clicking on it.
Quest: All places of a certain administrative level that have changed their level in a certain period of time: up- or downgrading to the level of a county (xian) in the period 1300-1400.
Output:
possibility to go back to the previous search respectively the sample of finds [white]
Quest: All places named Ma-something (馬?) through the a time range (to more easily decide which is the right one):
Output:
Searches should be as flexible as possible and should have the possibility to jump to co-references in the other databases (such as the “Technological Landscape”) via “list of datasets that also refer to this space-in-time-ID”. Results of searches that show a period in time should allow 'scrolling' through the results.
Results of searches should be made possible to be saved as a layer. So two searches can be compared.
(Dagmar for sure has enough examples for that . Big question: do we produce NEW space-in-time-IDs or do we use only the ones provided by Harvard CHGIS??)
Other researchers can upload their data permanently (C1) or integrate them into China GIS with leaving the data on their system (???if something like this is acceptable, respectively OK technically or concerning safety) (C2). Moreover they can setup their own database via a flexible interface provided by the China GIS website (C3). It should moreover be possible to enter comment to individual existent datasets (C4)1)
C1 Quest: a researcher has a list or database of geo-referential data concerning China (exclusively Chinese history?) he wants to permanently integrate into the China GIS with the aim to present it dynamically on a map and to put his data in relation to other data already available there.
procedure:
C2 only the structure is uploaded into China GIS. The actual data are stored on the system of the researcher (so if he is offline it does not work and if he changed the structure of his database, such as renaming a column or adding one, it won't work either, but for the researcher it is easier to revise and continue to work with his data?!)
C3. Beside the duty-field 'space-in-time-ID' the user can flexible decide what and how many fields/columns he needs for inputting his data. He has the possibility to design “Wertelisten” (“value-lists”?) for example to confine his use of keywords, product-groups etc. (Should it be possible to use value-lists of other already integrated databases??). To finally set up his database he goes through the same procedure as in 4.1 (individual name of database, person/institution in charge, date of upload. It should be possible for him to get his own login to continue to add rows of data and to download his data into a table, TAB separated text etc.)
C4. Users can add a commentary to a place in time or to a certain dataset of a certain database (such as a certain silk manufacture established 1230 in Hangzhou). These commentaries are not stored in the respective databases but in a separate database that links the ID of that data set from a certain database with the ID of the commentary in the commentary database (the space-in-time-ID should also be part of the commentary! Possibility to set up and link to a Wiki-page for ones comment??)